question: what are other consequences of not having a set definition for art?
the consequences? or potential benefits?
in any case, here's what would change:
for one thing allows us to not be narrow-minded in what we consider art. this allows us to take creative liberties. in the field of art, it allows us to be more well-rounded. science and math play huge roles in design, and in the same way many other subjects flow over and overlap with others.
do you find that a definition of art changes the way we view aesthetics by very much? or very little?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment